“Definition of Done” (DoD) — When Done mean Done in the Scrum framework.

 

In the Scrum framework, “Done” doesn’t simply mean that a task or a piece of work has been completed. Rather, it signifies that the work meets certain predefined criteria and is ready for release or shippable. This concept is captured in the “Definition of Done” (DoD) which serves as a shared understanding within the Scrum team of what it means for a product increment to be considered complete.

The Definition of Done comprises of various aspects, including functionality, quality, documentation, integration, and acceptance criteria. Let’s examine “Done” in the context of the Scrum framework in more detail:

Functionality:

The increment must fulfill all specified functional requirements and deliver the intended value to the end-users or customers. It should be fully implemented and meet the user stories or acceptance criteria defined for the sprint.

Quality:

The increment must undergo rigorous testing to ensure that it meets the required quality standards. This includes functional testing, performance testing, security testing, usability testing, and any other relevant forms of testing. The increment should be free from critical defects and meet the team’s definition of acceptable quality.

Documentation:

Comprehensive documentation must accompany the increment to facilitate understanding and usage. This may include user manuals, technical documentation, API documentation, release notes, and any other documentation deemed necessary for stakeholders.

Integration:

The increment should integrate seamlessly with existing systems, components, or features within the product. Compatibility and interoperability with other parts of the system are essential to ensure that the product functions as a cohesive whole.

Acceptance Criteria:

The product owner and stakeholders must verify that the increment meets the predefined acceptance criteria. This involves a review of the increment to ensure that it aligns with the sprint goals; the product vision, satisfies user needs, and delivers the expected value.

The norms which a Scrum Team uses to define DoDs may vary from one team to another, but it must be consistent within a given Scrum Team. There are usually different DoDs at various levels:

  • DoD for a Project/Product (In the project goals)
  • DoD for a Release (In the release goals)
  • DoD for a Sprint (In the sprint goals)
  • DoD for a User Story (In the User Story)
  • DoD for Tasks (In the task)

One more essential thing to keep in mind here is that a DoD is neither static nor indisputable. During the course of a project, a release, or a sprint, a DoD can be challenged by anyone from the Scrum team or other business and IT stakeholders. As long as the proposed changes of a DoD makes sense and they’re brought up to bring the project to success, the Scrum Team and the Scrum Product Owner should be openminded to listen to those proposals and implement them when and where necessary.

Best Practices:

  1. Collaborative Definition: The Definition of Done should be collaboratively defined by the development team, product owner, and stakeholders to ensure alignment and shared understanding.
  2. Explicit Criteria: Each criterion in the Definition of Done should be clearly defined and unambiguous to avoid misunderstandings and ensure accountability.
  3. Inspect and Adapt: Regularly review and refine the Definition of Done based on feedback, changing requirements, and evolving best practices.
  4. Automated Testing: Utilize automated testing tools and continuous integration pipelines to streamline the testing process and maintain consistent quality.

Avoid Malpractices:

  1. Indefinite Criteria: Ambiguous or incomplete criteria in the Definition of Done can lead to misunderstandings, rework, and delays in delivering value.
  2. Skipping Testing: Neglecting thorough testing or relying solely on manual testing increases the risk of defects and compromises product quality.
  3. Ignoring Stakeholder Feedback: Disregarding feedback from stakeholders or product owners can result in misaligned expectations and dissatisfaction with the delivered increment.
  4. Inflexibility: Being too rigid with the Definition of Done can hinder adaptability and innovation. It should evolve with the project and accommodate changing requirements.

Conclusion:

The Definition of Done is a cornerstone of Scrum that ensures transparency, quality, and alignment throughout the development process. By defining clear criteria for completeness, teams can deliver valuable increments consistently and effectively meet customer needs. Embracing best practices and avoiding common pitfalls empower teams to harness the full potential of the Definition of Done and achieve success in Agile software development.

“Muhammad Faizan Khan is a Lead Software Quality Assurance Engineer. Proven expertise and research in Agile development. Passionate about delivering high-quality software products through best testing practices and standards. He is a emerging technologies enthusiast and writer, passionate about exploring the frontiers of artificial intelligence and its impact on society.”

Note: The images used in this article are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent specific AI models or developments. Originally published at: https://medium.com

— — — — — — — — — Other Interesting Articles — — — — — — — - — —

Leading Quality: Becoming an Excellent Leader in Software Testing

Why a Plan is NOT a Strategy

Process and practice for Hotfix or Critical build

Agile Leadership: Empowering Teams for Success in Scrum

Keywords:
Definition of Done
Scrum framework
Agile DoD
Scrum completion criteria
Shippable increment
Scrum release readiness
Scrum predefined criteria
Scrum product increment
Scrum team understanding
Scrum functionality
Scrum documentation
Scrum integration
Scrum product vision
Scrum user needs
Scrum value delivery
Scrum release goals
Scrum user story DoD
Scrum task DoD
Scrum DoD levels
Scrum project DoD
Scrum release DoD
Scrum sprint DoD
Scrum user story criteria
Scrum task criteria
Scrum team norms
Scrum DoD flexibility
Scrum project adaptation
Scrum stakeholder role
Scrum review process
Scrum best practices
Scrum explicit criteria
Scrum unambiguous criteria
Scrum accountability
Scrum feedback review
Scrum changing requirements
Scrum evolving best practices
Scrum automated testing
Scrum continuous integration
Scrum consistent quality
Scrum avoid malpractices
Scrum indefinite criteria
Scrum rework avoidance
Scrum testing standards
Scrum manual testing risks
Scrum stakeholder feedback
Scrum expectations alignment
Scrum delivered increment
Scrum inflexibility risks
Scrum adaptability
Scrum innovation
Scrum project evolution
Scrum transparency
Scrum quality assurance
Scrum development process
Scrum clear criteria
Scrum customer needs
Scrum incremental delivery
Scrum harness potential
Scrum success factors
Agile software development
Scrum work completeness
Scrum rigorous testing
Scrum functional testing
Scrum performance testing
Scrum security testing
Scrum usability testing
Scrum critical defects
Scrum acceptable quality
Scrum comprehensive documentation
Scrum user manuals
Scrum technical documentation
Scrum API documentation
Scrum release notes
Scrum stakeholder communication
Scrum seamless integration
Scrum system compatibility
Scrum interoperability
Scrum cohesive product
Scrum verification process
Scrum sprint alignment
Scrum product vision alignment
Scrum user satisfaction
Scrum proposed changes
Scrum stakeholder proposals
Scrum success proposals
Scrum open-mindedness
Scrum product owner
Scrum DoD refinement
Scrum collaborative definition
Scrum shared understanding
Scrum inspect and adapt
Scrum evolving criteria
Scrum automated testing tools
Scrum testing pipeline
Scrum testing process
Scrum consistent quality delivery
Scrum criteria clarity
Scrum criteria ambiguity
Scrum misunderstandings
Scrum rework prevention
Scrum delivery delays
Scrum thorough testing
Scrum testing neglect
Scrum defect risks
Scrum product quality
Scrum stakeholder input
Scrum feedback importance
Scrum expectation management
Scrum delivered product
Scrum DoD rigidity
Scrum DoD evolution
Scrum project requirements
Scrum process adaptability
Scrum innovation facilitation
Scrum success in Agile
Scrum framework benefits
Scrum team roles
Scrum development standards
Scrum sprint completion
Scrum DoD implementation
Scrum quality assurance practices
Scrum functional criteria
Scrum integration requirements
Scrum product delivery
Scrum release readiness criteria
Scrum product increment criteria
Scrum functionality requirements
Scrum end-user value
Scrum customer delivery
Scrum implemented functionality
Scrum user stories
Scrum functional delivery
Scrum rigorous testing process
Scrum performance standards
Scrum security standards
Scrum usability standards
Scrum critical defect management
Scrum quality definition
Scrum comprehensive documentation standards
Scrum user guide
Scrum technical standards
Scrum API standards
Scrum release documentation
Scrum stakeholder documentation
Scrum integration process
Scrum system integration
Scrum component integration
Scrum feature integration
Scrum compatibility standards
Scrum system interoperability
Scrum cohesive system
Scrum acceptance process
Scrum product owner verification
Scrum stakeholder verification
Scrum sprint goal alignment
Scrum product vision goals
Scrum user need satisfaction
Scrum value expectations
Scrum DoD norms
Scrum team standards
Scrum consistent DoD
Scrum team flexibility
Scrum DoD adaptation
Scrum proposed DoD changes
Scrum team proposals
Scrum open-minded team
Scrum success implementation
Scrum stakeholder collaboration
Scrum evolving requirements
Scrum automated quality assurance
Scrum testing tools
Scrum testing automation
Scrum testing consistency
Scrum clear criteria definition
Scrum criteria ambiguity avoidance
Scrum delivery consistency
Scrum criteria unambiguity
Scrum understanding avoidance
Scrum thorough criteria
Scrum criteria evolution
Scrum delivery improvement
Scrum consistent value delivery
Definition of Done Scrum
Agile completion criteria
Scrum framework Done criteria
Agile software development standards
Scrum increment criteria
Agile quality assurance standards
Agile product increments
Definition of Done project level
Definition of Done release level
Definition of Done sprint level
Definition of Done user story
Definition of Done tasks
Agile development milestones
Scrum development team responsibilities
Agile testing practices
Scrum documentation standards
Scrum integration practices
Agile user story acceptance
Scrum sprint review
Scrum sprint retrospective
Agile sprint planning
Scrum product backlog refinement
Scrum team velocity
Agile development best practices
Scrum software delivery
Scrum incremental development
Agile release management
Scrum product backlog grooming
Agile project management practices
Scrum team communication
Definition of Done examples
Scrum workflow efficiency
Agile software engineering
Scrum sprint ceremonies
Scrum sprint backlog
Scrum task estimation
Agile stakeholder engagement
Scrum sprint progress
Definition of Done checklist
Agile development lifecycle
Scrum continuous improvement
Scrum retrospective action items
Agile team collaboration tools
Scrum sprint goals alignment
Scrum sprint deliverables
Agile sprint review meeting
Scrum sprint demo
Agile sprint retrospective outcomes
Scrum sprint planning meeting
Agile backlog prioritization
Scrum product increment delivery
Agile project success factors
Agile product backlog management
Scrum definition of ready
Scrum user story refinement
Agile sprint cadence
Scrum sprint duration
Agile product vision alignment
Scrum team motivation
Definition of Done refinement
Agile sprint execution
Scrum sprint closure
Scrum sprint cycle
Agile team roles and responsibilities
Scrum sprint retrospective format
Agile sprint planning agenda
Scrum sprint goal setting
Scrum sprint commitment
Agile sprint scope management
Scrum sprint execution plan
Agile sprint progress tracking
Scrum sprint progress review
Scrum sprint backlog management
Agile sprint burndown chart
Scrum sprint velocity calculation
Agile sprint capacity planning
Scrum sprint goal achievement
Agile sprint performance metrics
Scrum sprint task prioritization
Agile sprint timeline management
Scrum sprint timeline adherence
Agile sprint impediment resolution
Scrum sprint issue escalation
Agile sprint resource allocation
Scrum sprint team collaboration
Agile sprint communication channels
Scrum sprint status reporting
Agile sprint decision-making process
Scrum sprint goal evaluation
Agile sprint outcome analysis
Scrum sprint performance review
Agile sprint lessons learned
Scrum, Done, Definition of Done (DoD), Functionality, Quality, Documentation, Integration, Acceptance Criteria, User Stories, Sprint Goals, Product Vision, Stakeholders, Project, Release, Sprint, Task, Best Practices, Collaborative Definition, Explicit Criteria, Inspect and Adapt, Automated Testing, Malpractices, Ambiguous Criteria, Skipping Testing, Stakeholder Feedback, Inflexibility
How to define Done in Scrum
What is included in a Definition of Done
Best practices for creating a Definition of Done
Common pitfalls of using a Definition of Done
The benefits of using a Definition of Done in Scrum

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Understanding the “Definition of Done” (DoD) is incredibly helpful in Scrum, as it sets clear quality standards and ensures that every task is truly complete before moving forward. This clarity reduces ambiguity, enhances team alignment, and significantly improves the overall quality of deliverables, ultimately leading to more reliable and successful project outcomes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, I’m glad to hear that you found it helpful.

      Delete
  3. This blog effectively clarifies how the 'Definition of Done' ensures true completion in the Scrum framework.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Clear and concise explanation of DoD in Scrum.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A detail-oriented explanation of DoD helps the teams to achieve their goals.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is one of the best explanations of DoD I’ve come across.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The way you connected DoD to overall project transparency is excellent.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Process and practice for Hotfix or Critical build

Revolutionizing Software Testing: How AI-Powered ChatGPT SQA Expert Automates QA at 10x Speed